Skip to content
  • Product
  • DevOps
  • AppSec
  • All Scans
    • SCA Scans
    • SAST Scans
    • DAST Scans
  • Pricing
  • Blogs
  • Docs
Menu
  • Product
  • DevOps
  • AppSec
  • All Scans
    • SCA Scans
    • SAST Scans
    • DAST Scans
  • Pricing
  • Blogs
  • Docs
Login
Sign up For Free Forever
Login
Use For Free Forver
  • Product
  • DevOps
  • AppSec
  • All Scans
    • SCA Scans
    • SAST Scans
    • DAST Scans
  • Pricing
  • Blogs
  • Docs
Menu
  • Product
  • DevOps
  • AppSec
  • All Scans
    • SCA Scans
    • SAST Scans
    • DAST Scans
  • Pricing
  • Blogs
  • Docs
  • Product
  • DevOps
  • AppSec
  • All Scans
    • SCA Scans
    • SAST Scans
    • DAST Scans
  • Pricing
  • Blogs
  • Docs
  • Login
  • Use For Free Forever
Menu
  • Product
  • DevOps
  • AppSec
  • All Scans
    • SCA Scans
    • SAST Scans
    • DAST Scans
  • Pricing
  • Blogs
  • Docs
  • Login
  • Use For Free Forever

Sken vs CheckMarx

Sken performs more comprehensive AppSec coverage at a fraction of the cost.

Sign up For Free
Request Demo

CheckMarx and Sken offer different capabilities with a dramatic price difference.

CheckMarx performs source code scanning with SAST and coverage for SCA but has poor coverage for securing applications at run-time. It is also much more expensive to acquire, as well as more expensive to run on an on-going basis. CheckMarx products are not well-integrated and don’t prioritize between the various types of results.

Sken.ai also provides a comprehensive view of application security, and adds sophisticated correlation and prioritization across SAST, DAST, SCA, Secrets and vulnerability management at a fraction of the cost of GitLab. Security add-on in GitLab is 5x the cost of CheckMarx.

Sken also correlates across these different application security testing methods to weed out false positives and identify real issues that have an impact on the security posture of the application.

CheckMarx Provides:

  • Source code scanning based on a proprietary rules engine
  • Visibility into open-source software components
  • Limited run-time analysis with their new IAST product

CheckMarx does not (while Sken does) provide:

  • Dynamic scanning of deployed/production applications with DAST
  • Understanding of unknown security issues, including OSS, application code and third-party interfaces via DAST
  • Lower false positives via correlation of source code scanning and run-time application security testing
  • Fraction of the cost of CheckMarx, and easier to implement and use

Sken Vs. CheckMarx

asdasdaasdssdas Sken CheckMarx
DAST

SAST

SCA

Secrets

Easy Deployment

AI based Correlation across scans

Affordable

Social Media

Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in Vimeo-v

Sitemap

  • Home
  • Product
  • DevOps
  • AppSec
  • Privacy policy

Resources

  • Blog

Comparison

  • Sken vs Veracode
  • Sken vs Stackhawk
  • Sken vs Sonarqube
  • Sken vs Snyk
  • Sken vs Gitlab's Devsecops
  • Sken vs Checkmarx

Company

For general inquires

  • hello@sken.ai

Newsletter

© 2020 Sken AI. All rights reserved.

Social Media

Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in Vimeo-v Youtube

Sitemap

  • Home
  • Product
  • DevOps
  • AppSec
  • Privacy policy

Resources

  • Blog

Company

  • For general inquires
  • hello@skenai.wpcomstaging.com

Newsletter

© 2020 Sken AI. All rights reserved.