Sken vs GitLab’s DevSecOps
Unlike GitLab’s DevSecOps Sken allows DevOps teams the flexibility to work in any environment they are comfortable in.
GitLab and Sken offer different value propositions for flexibility in DevSecOps.
GitLab is focused on the entire application development lifecycle (SDLC) and locks DevOps into their environment.
Sken.ai also provides a comprehensive view of application security, and adds sophisticated correlation and prioritization across SAST, DAST, SCA, Secrets and vulnerability management at a fraction of the cost of GitLab. Security add-on in GitLab is 5x the cost of their CI/CD offering.
Sken also correlates across these different application security testing methods to weed out false positives and identify real issues that have an impact on the security posture of the application.
GitLab Provides:
- SAST, DAST, SCA/dependencies, open-source vulnerability scans
- Forces devops into the GitLab CI/CD environment
GitLab does not (while Sken does) provide:
- Allow DevOps and AppSec to work in the CI/CD and security management frameworks that are best suited to their environments
- Lower false positives via correlation of source code scanning, run-time application security testing, secrets scanning, fuzz testing etc.
- Lower the cost of application security across the SDLC (affordability)
Sken Vs. GitLab
| Sken | Gitlab | |
|---|---|---|
|
DAST |
|
|
|
SAST |
|
|
|
SCA |
|
|
|
Secrets |
|
|
|
Flexibility - Supports any CI/CD platform |
|
|
|
Comprehensive security |
|
|
|
AI based source code scanning |
|
|
|
AI based Correlation across scans |
|
|
|
Affordable |
|
|
