Sken vs Snyk
Sken adds capabilities above and beyond what Snyk provides making Sken a crucial complement to Snyk.
Snyk and Sken offer different capabilities for application security testing.
Snyk relies on a database of known vulnerabilities in open-source components and scans source code for dependencies to check against this list of known vulnerabilities.
Sken.ai uses a combination of known vulnerability data, source code scanning for dependencies, code scanning for bugs and testing applications at run-time for a comprehensive view of application security.
Sken also correlates across these different application security testing methods to weed out false positives and identify real issues that have an impact on the security posture of the application.
Snyk Provides:
- Visibility into open-source software components
- License compliance for third-party software
- Understanding of known vulnerabilities
Snyk does not (while Sken does) provide:
- Finding vulnerabilities in your source code with SAST
- Dynamic scanning of deployed applications with DAST
- Continuous security scanning of deployed apps with DAST
- Understanding of unknown security issues, including OSS, application code and third-party interfaces.
- Lower false positives via correlation of source code scanning and run-time application security testing
- Better Security at an extremely affordable price
Sken Vs. Snyk
| Sken | Snyk | |
|---|---|---|
|
DAST |
|
|
|
SAST |
|
|
|
SCA |
|
|
|
Secrets |
|
|
|
Easy Deployment in CI/CD |
|
|
|
AI based Correlation |
|
|
|
Affordable |
|
|
